HOME
Bird On The Wire
an online column by Carmel Bird
No. 7
12 July 1998Previous columns
The future of the book
Time Slices
Outside In
The Tried and Tested
The Man Behind The Woman
Uncorrected ProofWhen I was a child we lived near a place I associated with mad dogs because it was called Rabies Hill. One time
I asked my mother why it had that name and she lowered
her voice to a whisper, explaining that it was really Reibey's
Hill, named after Mary Reibey who had been a convict woman.
Worse than mad dogs. Until then I had known only of convict men,
part of a dark, cruel, hidden and romantically attractive Tasmanian
past. My mother made it clear that Mary Reibey and other
convict women were not a suitable topic for discussion.
Until recent times it has been quite usual in Tasmania for
the evidence of convict history to be concealed and
even destroyed. At the end of last century the Chief Justice
of the colony publicly stated that convict buildings and relics
should be removed in order to blot out the memory of past
shame. In 1810 Edward Lord, who was temporarily in charge of the
colony after the death of Governor Collins, and whose wife had been
a convict, destroyed many of the records. These are but two examples
of official and unofficial policy to bury the ugly past.
I suppose it goes without saying that from the moment my mother
whispered the name of Mary Reibey I became keen to
know more about the lives of women in the Australian penal
colonies. A common pastime in my childhood was to seek out the
marks of the broad arrow for evidence of convict construction of buildings.
These were easy to find, compared with evidence
of the work of women. I
wondered very much about Mary Reibey, and
about the other women who
had been transported to Tasmania, who they were, how they lived, what they felt.
There are a few stones remaining to mark the place of the
female factory in Hobart; none, as far as I know, marking
the place in Launceston. The women washed and wove and worked as
servants. Sometimes there is a relic of their needlework. Two
of the most interesting and touching examples of this are the
Rajah quilt, which is in the National Gallery in Canberra,
and the christening gown in the Tasmanian Museum in Hobart. Both
these articles were communal works that would have involved
considerable co-operation between the women and they
therefore cast a sweeter light on those women than might be expected.
Another thing is letters. In 1992 Nance Irvine
published the collected letters of Mary Reibey
(Dear Cousin: The Reibey Letters, Hale & Iremonger).
The first letter was written to her aunt in 1792 as
Mary was about to arrive in New South Wales, at the
age of thirteen, having been convicted and transported
for stealing a horse. The last of Mary's letters to
be preserved was written in 1845, six years before she
died. Hers is a story of a life of great triumph over the early
fact of her conviction. It is, I think, a story my mother should have
told me. But the only thing my mother seemed to know about
Mary Reibey was that she was a criminal.
Not far from where I grew up is a colonial house called
Entally, which was built by Thomas, the son of Mary Reibey,
hence the name of the hill. There was really no need for my
mother to associate the place with the convict past of Mary.
Such attempts to conceal the past succeed only in revealing
it in a more fascinating light. Entally was opened to visitors
as an historic home in the late 1940s, and I was a frequent
visitor, attempting to soak up the information and atmosphere,
which I found compelling. And I was conscious that behind
this charming place with its little bluestone chapel,
coach house, glass house, and its broad lawns and
romantic twisting narrow staircase there lurked
the murky stains of crime and punishment.
There's a ghost at Entally. Sometimes at night, the
temperature on the staircase drops dramatically and the
shadowy figure of a turbanned Indian materialises, then
disappears. I am sorry to say I never saw this ghost.
I have never heard an explanation, a story behind the Indian,
although there is a tale that one woman who saw the
ghost ended up in the asylum at New Norfolk as a result.
Nobody ever gives any names or dates for this case. But
it has kind of poetic, gothic authority.
If ever there was a place riddled with ghost
stories, it's Tasmania. I mean that in
a serious way. I think that so much that was cruel and dark and
terrible happened there in a concentrated form that the
memories linger in the place itself, informing the
stones, the air. The island was a prison. The indigenous
people were invaded, dispossessed,
murdered. It has to be haunted. I believe it is.
I don't know what you do about ghosts,
exactly. However, one thing that seems to me
to be important is the open study and
acknowledgement of what happened in the past, whatever
that may be. And furthermore I think it is important
to cultivate a response to what happened. Something that
kicked along my interest in the secret past of Tasmania
happened when I was at high school. We were invited
to write essays about our country to exchange with
essays written by students at a high school in Missouri.
My essay was about convicts and Aborigines, and
the teacher said she could not permit it to go
overseas because of the unsuitable subject matter.
The history of Tasmania is not pretty; it is
not funny. Places I like to visit are the state museums
in Hobart and Launceston, and some of the historic
homes. There the relics of the past are treated with
a sobriety and respect that can be absent from historic sites,
which tend towards the theme park and can lead to the trivialisation
of history. Or the prettification of the past. One of the Tasmanian
telephone directories has on the cover a photograph of
Queenstown where the landscape has been destroyed by
mining. It is a picture of weird desolation. The caption to the photograph
is 'Colourful Rocks'. That little phrase reminds me of my
mother's whisper as she tried to deflect
my interest in the gruesome facts of history.
HOMECopyright © Carmel Bird 1998. All rights reserved.